|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Facts and Figures • In Data from 2002 show that 24% of Indigenous Australians aged 15 years or over reported being the victim of physical or threatened violence in the 12 months prior to the survey, 16% reported being arrested and 7% reported being incarcerated in the 5 years prior to the survey. • In 2003, 20% of prisoners in Australia (4,818 prisoners) identified as Indigenous, and 10 of the 39 deaths that occurred in prison custody (26%) were Indigenous prisoners. • At June 2004, there were 5,048 Indigenous persons in prisons across Australia (21% of all prisoners). Indigenous persons were 11 times more likely to be in prison compared with non-Indigenous persons. • Indigenous prisoners tend to be serving shorter sen-tences and have higher rates of prior imprisonment. In 2004, the median expected time to serve for Indigenous prisoners was 15 months, compared with 25 months for non-Indigenous prisoners. 77% of Indigenous prisoners had prior imprisonment in comparison to 53% of non-Indigenous prisoners. • In 2004, Western Australia recorded the highest ratio of Indigenous to non-Indigenous imprisonment, as the Indigenous imprisonment rate was 17 times the non-Indigenous imprisonment rate. Tasmania recorded the lowest ratio, where Indigenous rates were 4 times the non-Indigenous rates. • In 2002, 35% of Indigenous Australians aged 15 years or over reported having been formally charged at some time in their lives. 16% of Indigenous persons reported having been arrested in the last 5 years. • Unemployment was higher for Indigenous people who reported being arrested in the last 5 years (29% compared with 11% of those not arrested) and employment was lower (36% compared with 48%). • A higher proportion of Indigenous people who had come into contact with law enforcement reported being victims of personal violence. 47% of Indigenous people who reported being arrested also reported being the victim of physical or threatened violence compared with 20% of those who had not been arrested. • In 2002 Indigenous people recorded higher levels of victimisation than non-Indigenous people (20% compared with 9%). • Illicit drug use is the strongest predictor of both criminal prosecution and imprisonment. High-risk alcohol con-sumption is the second most important predictor of criminal prosecution and the third most important predictor of imprisonment. Other factors that increased the risk of prosecution or imprisonment included: experiencing financial stress, living in a crowded household and being a member of the Stolen Generation. • A BOCSAR study examined the question of whether the higher rate of Indigenous imprisonment is due to racial bias in sentencing. The researchers found no evidence of racial bias in sentencing. • Indigenous offenders are about 2.5 times more likely than non-Indigenous offenders to receive a prison sentence, if convicted. However, this difference disappears when controls are introduced for factors (e.g. plea, offence, prior record) that courts can legitimately take into account in sentencing. • Indigenous offenders are more likely to receive a prison sentence than non-Indigenous offenders because they: have much longer criminal records; are more likely to be convicted of a violent offence; are more likely at any given court appearance to be convicted of multiple offences; are more likely to have breached a previous court order; are much more likely to have re-offended after being given an alternative to full-time imprisonment, such as periodic detention and/or a suspended sentence. • In South Australia, the Northern Territory, Western Australia and Queensland, black women are more than 111/2 times more likely to be killed than white women. But in Victoria, NSW the ACT and Tasmania, women are killed twice as often. • While the murder rate for Indigenous males was 7 times higher than that for other men, the rate for Indigenous women was 11 times higher than that for other women. • In SA, WA, NT and Queensland, 71% of those murders occurred in remote
or very remote
areas, whereas
for Aboriginal
men it was
51%. (p.25) • Indigenous people aged 18 years or over experience double the victimisation rate of non-Indigenous people. • In 2004-2005, Indigenous children were more likely than non-Indigenous children to be reported to child protection authorities because of neglect rather than abuse concerns. For example, in Western Australia, 50% of Indigenous children in substantiations were the subject of neglect, compared with 28% of other children. • In 2004-2005, Indigenous children were much less likely than non-Indigenous children to be reported because of sexual abuse concerns. In NSW 11% of Indigenous children in substantiations were the subject of sexual abuse, compared with 19% of other children. • According to crime statistics recorded by NSW police in 2000, the rate
of reports to
police
of sexual
assault of
Indigenous
children was more
than double that of non-Indigenous
children. However, as with other
types of abuse,
the real extent of
child sexual
abuse
in Indigenous
communities
is not known, as many incidents
are not reported to police. . |